We are all about operational strategy.

Claims Leakage Review

Case Study / A workplace health insurance provider

Why We Were There

LSI was engaged to review the level of claims leakage within our clients Contents claims as part of a wider leakage programme across multiple classes of business. Claims leakage is defined as the overpayment or under collection of a claim and/or the existence of inefficient or non-value adding processes.

Examples of claims overpayments include:

Excess not deducted
Payment not covered by policy
Duplicated payments
Fraudulent claims

Examples of claims under collection include:

Recovery opportunities not identified
Recovery abandoned prematurely

LSI provided our client with a report with the leakage issues identified, supporting analysis and insights.

Outcomes

13.9% claims leakage worth $7-8 million for the annual claims population

A number of key issues were identified across policy application, claims management and recovery to give insight to client about where improvements could be made

The Approach

The claims leakage analysis involved a review of contents claim files, selected from a sample of the closed claims population. The intent was to define the level of overpayment or under collection of claim costs. In total, 200 files were reviewed during the exercise. A detailed questionnaire was used to address the key aspects of the claims management covering:

  • Policy application
  • Settlement
  • Service providers
  • Salvage
  • Recovery
  • Fraud
  • Legal

The approach utilised a cloud-based leakage assessment tool to review, approve and report on leakage incidents. Each claim was reviewed by our client and then a second review was undertaken by LSI before reaching agreement on the claim findings.

Services Applied

Operational Strategy

Process Design & Optimisation

Continuous Improvement

Case Studies

Proven Success: Real-World Results from Our Clients

Customer Centricity and Cost Savings

LSI was engaged to improve the customer experience and save money by reducing unnecessary duplication costs. LSI found savings of between 18.3 and 24.6 FTE across the scope of the project.

Redesign of Resource Consents Operating Model

The client approached LSI to address significant challenges within their resource consenting process. Developers in the region expressed frustration with the lengthy and costly process of obtaining consents, as well as inconsistency in advice.